OJ Armed Robbery

OJ Simpson's second trial for armed robbery though is seen by some people as justice and was deserved, I believe it was a horrible misconduct of power by the judge and court, along with the people that went along with the ruling and supported the cases outcome. In the documentary they state how a normal person would get away with two years for all rulings. However this case was proven to be payback for the misruling on the first double murder case. There was several aspects that point to the judge misfairly ruling against OJ Simpson. There were even things that people noticed that might have been quincidences but were interesting that they landed on this ruling, like how it was the murder case anniversary the day of the armed robbery ruling. As well as the judge ruling the max sentence on every one of the rulings. This in my opinion was a unfair use of power that the judge used her small case to get what she believed was the proper ruling on another sentence that she had nothing to do with.